Only one page of #misandry ... so far. How is it that nobody even knows the word misandry, when the messaging is increasingly pervasive and the inverse prejudice is (rightly) universally condemned?
-
Posted to michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us
On Misandry
- Tags:
- social justice
- society
- norms
- values
- misandry
-
Posted to evernote.com
What's Killing U.S.: Systemically Asymmetric Morality Disorder
http://www.evernote.com/pub/silverton/evernote#e2ba1a9d-4088-426a-9e7f-8ce1ad227d62
Precisely, dawg. And it's not just fuzzy concepts of "fairness" ... cuz surely we all know "life ain't fair" ... it's the fact that Illegal and Immoral behaviors land poor and non-white people in prison, while simultaneously granting ever escalating entitlements to women and emeritus cronies.
Yeah, it's time to look up the word misandry, too, boys and girls. If you think it's not just as real and malignant as it's (to date, rightly) Entire Academic Departments Dedicated To It's Inverse kin (misogyny); then you're not payin' attention. Please go back and read that last sentence again if you missed; no time to rewrite for pre-digestion today, sorry.
-
Posted to google.com
The Futurist: The Misandry Bubble
http://www.singularity2050.com/2010/01/the-misandry-bubble.html
Shared by @silverton
Interesting. Glad to see I'm not the only one bringing this up in polite company. I just mentioned this yesterday in a conversation with four female friends. When asked, "do you know the word misogyny?" A chorus of "obviously!" rose. I then asked, "but what is it's inverse?" Not a single one had ever heard of the word misandry. Executive Summary : The Western World has quietly become a civilization that undervalues men and overvalues women, where the state forcibly transfers resources from men to women creating various perverse incentives for otherwise good women to conduct great evil against men and children, and where male nature is vilified but female nature is celebrated. This is unfair to both genders, and is a recipe for a rapid civilizational decline and displacement, the costs of which will ultimately be borne by a subsequent generation of innocent women, rather than men, as soon as 2020.
- Tags:
- social justice
- society
- norms
- values
- misandry
-
Posted to michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us
Bill Moyers & Bill Maher Clarify the Progressive Healthcare Agenda
-
Posted to michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us
What is #SSSS and When do we Repeal the Patriot Act?
Happy 9/11!
Break out your #TinfoilHats and prepare to receive the Mark of the Beast as #ObamaCare Socialist Daemons rise up from the secret CIA sewer surveillance network to unplug the respirators of everyone over the age of 40 and shove Government Feeding Tubes down the throat of everyone else, in order to pump in the Government Takeover Socialist Government Socialist Soylent Green that will brainwash you into trading your guns for cases of Napa Valley Pinot Grigio! =Phew= take a breath, there, run-on boy! And remember that #healthcare was only a diversion by The Totally Socialist Socialists to complete George W. Bush's Illuminati Templar Socialist Scheme! The socialists are coming! The socialists are coming! Dick Cheney is their Puppet Master!
Oh, puh-lease ... you've been reading long enough to be an unofficial member of the officially unofficial #MadScientistClown Underground and to grok that snarky skewered satire by now, right? Thank you, I knew you had. ;-)
Now, on to the topic at hand.
* Rotten Tomatoes says: T-Meter 78% ... Community 85%
* IMDB says: 7.5 out of 10 stars
* WTF is it? It's The End of America ... maybe ... unless we sell enough units ... then ... maybe not so much
* If u have Netflix watch The End of America at http://tr.im/watcheoa (hint: message is bit of a mixed bag, wethinks; part #tinfoilhat adhesive, part "part of the problem," part priming the pump, part restatement of the obvious)
* Or, if you can wait until September 17 or 18, 2009, you can watch for $1.00 at http://endofamericamovie.com (maybe a bunch of us could watch together with the #SSSS hashtag, or better yet, for the sake of not spamming followers, in a TinyChat http://tinychat.com/endofamerica or something
* Or, if you can get it to work, supposedly watch free at SnagFilms (didn't work for me on the Mac & no time to troubleshoot right now)
* Learn about #SSSS with a bit less hyperbole at http://tr.im/sssswtf
* Explore Slate's Take on End of America Scenarios http://tr.im/eoascenarios
* Other links from the movie
** http://www.myamericaproject.com (apparently borked)
** http://www.americanfreedomcampaign.org
** History of an URL barely seen for fraction of a second in the movie http://tr.im/anarchistaction
** http://naomiwolf.org/
Another presentation about the movie, by Naomi Wolf:- Tags:
- All Posts
- social justice
- politics
-
Posted to google.com
The Snowe Job, and Why a "Trigger" for a Public Option is Nonsense (via feedly)
http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2009/09/snowe-job-and-why-trigger-for-public.html
Shared by @silverton: As tweeted earlier http://twitter.com/silverton/status/3902022666 ... leave it to Dr. Reich to expound the rationale PRECISELY!
-----
I was just on the phone talking with a reporter for a national media outlet who referred to Senator Olympia Snowe's idea for a public option "trigger" as the "centrist position." Whoa. When the mainstream media start naming something as "centrist" the game is almost over because just about everyone with any authority in our nation's capital wants to be at the "center."Let me back up a step. The public insurance option has become a lightening rod for Republicans, hate radio jocks, Fox News, the Wall Street Journal's editorial page, and lobbyists for the health-industrial complex who accuse the White House and Democrats of planning a "government takeover" of health care. Anything that has the word "public" in it is always an automatic target for their rants. But most Democrats understand that a public insurance option is essential to control healthcare costs and expand coverage -- both because private for-profit insurers now face so little competition in most markets that only the prod of a public option will force them to lower costs and extend coverage, and also because a nationwide public option would have the scale and authority to negotiate lower rates with drug companies and healthcare providers, thereby pushing private insurers to do the same.The White House is looking for a way to be in favor of a public option but also get enough Blue Dog Democrats -- many of whom hail from swing districts and states, and therefore need some cover -- to vote for it. One such cover is a Republican Senator from Maine, named Olympia Snowe. If she votes for the bill, Blue Dogs can calm their constituents -- who have been worked up into a lather by the right -- by saying "you see? Even a prominent Republican senator is voting for this."So will Snowe play ball? It depends. Her idea (evidently encouraged by Rahm Emanuel, the President's chief of staff) is to hold off on any public option. Give the private insurance companies a period of time -- say, five years -- within which to make changes that extend coverage to more people and also drive down long-term costs. If those goals for coverage and cost aren't met by end of the five-year grace period, kaboom: the public option is triggered -- which will force such changes on the insurance companies.The beauty of Snowe's proposal is that it seems to offer Blue Dogs a way out and liberal Democrats a way in. Nobody has to vote for or against a public option. The public option just happens automatically if its purposes -- wider coverage and lower costs -- aren't achieved. And the trigger idea seems so, well, centrist.The problem is twofold. First, it's impossible to design airtight goals for coverage and cost reductions that won't be picked over by five thousand lobbyists and as many lawyers and litigators even if, at the end of the grace period, it's apparent to everyone else that the goals aren't met. Washington is a vast cesspool of well-paid specialists who know how to stop anything resembling a "trigger." Believe me, they will.Second, any controversial proposal with some powerful support behind it that gets delayed -- for five years or three years or whenever -- is politically dead. Supporters lose interest. Public attention wanders. The media are on to other issues. Right now the public option is very much alive because so many Democrats care deeply about it, with good reason. But put it off for years, and assign it to the lawyers and lobbyists I just mentioned, and you can kiss it goodbye for ever.If the idea is to have a public option waiting in the wings in case private insurers blow it, why wait for it at all? If it gets lower costs and wider coverage, it should be included right from the start.What worries me isn't just that the mainstream media are calling Snowe's trigger "centrist," but that the White House might see it as an easy out. "I continue to believe that a public option within that basket of insurance choices would help improve quality and bring down costs," the President said Monday. Fine. But he hasn't yet said the public option is essential. He hasn't threatened to veto a bill lacking it. There's even reason to believe the White House has quietly encouraged Olympia Snowe to pursue her "trigger."The best way to give Blue Dogs cover is for the President to explain clearly and boldly why the public option is essential to health care reform, and why he's ready to veto any bill that doesn't include it. That's also the only way to give the nation a good chance of getting true health care reform. Hopefully, that's what he'll do Wednesday evening.Otherwise, we get a trigger to nowhere. [extracted from The Snowe Job, and Why a "Trigger" for a Public Option is Nonsense via feedly] -
Posted to silverton.posterous.com
By 1985
http://silverton.posterous.com/by-1985-0
OBSERVATION: Yikes! This default Posterous import is U.G.L.Y.! Add to CSS hackaton list!
-----
Keep it Simple, Stupid.Download now or watch on posterous bucky_by_1985.3gp (199 KB) <a href="http://wikidashboard.parc.com/wiki/Buckminster_Fuller" rel="external">http://wikidashboard.parc.com/wiki/Buckminster_Fuller</a> If it's Broken, Fix It.http://wikidashboard.parc.com:80/wiki/Andre_Gorz
Permalink
| Leave a comment »
- Tags:
- All Posts
- social justice
- posterous
-
Posted to michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us
US unemployment is 18.2% counting “the old-fashioned way”
http://michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us/packets/?p=1166
The unemployment timebomb is quietly ticking. One dog has yet to bark in this long winding crisis. Beyond riots in Athens and a Baltic bust-up, we have not seen evidence of bitter political protest as the slump eats away at the legitimacy of governing elites in North America, Europe, and Japan. It may just be a matter of time. SOURCE: Telegraph.co.uk. Do keep in mind that in America, some of the “governing elites” may inhabit Washington, D.C. but the vast majority do not. So, for the sake of those who would like to turn back the clock to some mythical Good Old Days, which never were, you might be surprised to find the ol’ rose-colored lenses a bit more — how shall we put this sensitively — brownish in hue, compared to what you thought you recalled: The Centre for Labour Market Studies (CLMS) in Boston says US unemployment is now 18.2pc, counting the old-fashioned way. The reason why this does not “feel” like the 1930s is that we tend to compress the chronology of the Depression. It takes time for people to deplete their savings and sink into destitution. Perhaps our greater cushion of wealth today will prevent another Grapes of Wrath, but 20m US homeowners are already in negative equity (zillow.com data). Evictions are running at a terrifying pace. [Emphasis mine].
-
Posted to michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us
Remix for Progressive Effect
http://michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us/packets/?p=976
Inadvertently stumbled across this remix on a slow starting Saturday morning, due to Pandora playing in the background. To recreate: 1. Queue up 04.18.09 NPR Weekend Edition’s interview with Joe Queenan, author of "Closing Time". 2. Queue up the following 4 artists/songs: NiN / Suck, Tool / 46&2, RATM / Killing in the Name, Massive Attack / Teardrop. 3. Mix volumes to taste. "Over the course of time, I got tired of listening to middle class and upper middle class people’s stories, and I got tired to listening to their problems, ‘cuz they didn’t have problems. You know, problems are food, problems are shelter, or problems are somebody down the street has got a gun. Problems are not ‘my daddy doesn’t appreciate me enough’ or ‘I didn’t get into Middlebury,’ those aren’t problems. I wanted to write about what poverty is really like. I wanted to make it clear to people that we don’t all come from the same background. Just because I speak this way, and just because I’ve been to La Sorbonne, and just because I’ve read Marcel Proust: I didn’t start out like you, and there’s a lot of people like me. Don’t you ever think that we all started out the same way, and don’t you ever take your own good fortune for granted.” — Joe Queenan This remix of NPR segments with industrial metal (or anything, for that matter) strikes me as an interesting idea to play with later; overlapping progressive music with progressive dialog.
-
Posted to michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us
Jon Stewart Skewers CNBC, His Finest Hour Yet
http://michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us/packets/?p=940
Possibly Stewart’s finest hour, yet.
-
Posted to michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us
Total Social Collapse HOWTO
http://michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us/packets/?p=921
Stewart Brand’s notes from last night’s Total Social Collapse meet-up and pep rally: Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:10:24 -0800 From: Stewart Brand Subject: [SALT] Managing social collapse (Orlov talk) With vintage Russian black humor, Orlov described the social collapse he witnessed in Russia in the 1990s and spelled out its practical lessons for the American social collapse he sees as inevitable. The American economy in the 1990s described itself as “Goldilocks”—just the right size—when in fact is was “Tinkerbelle,” and one day the clapping stops. As in Russia, the US made itself vulnerable to the decline of crude oil, a trade deficit, military over-reach, and financial over-reach. Russians were able to muddle through the collapse by finding ways to manage:
food, shelter, transportation, and security.
Russian agriculture had long been ruined by collectivization, so people had developed personal kitchen gardens, accessible by public transit. The state felt a time-honored obligation to provide bread, and no one starved. (Orlov noted that women in Russia handled collapse pragmatically, putting on their garden gloves, whereas middle-aged men dissolved into lonely drunks.) Americans are good at gardening and could shift easily to raising their own food, perhaps adopting the Cuban practice of gardens in parking lots and on roofs and balconies. As for shelter, Russians live in apartments from which they cannot be evicted. The buildings are heat-efficient, and the communities are close enough to protect themselves from the increase in crime. Americans, Orlov said, have yet to realize there is no lower limit to real estate value, nor that suburban homes are expensive to maintain and get to. He predicts flight, not to remote log cabins, but to dense urban living. Office buildings, he suggests, can easily be converted to apartments, and college campuses could make instant communities, with all that grass turned into pasture or gardens. There are already plenty of empty buildings in America; the cheapest way to get one is to offer to caretake it. The rule with transportation, he said, is not to strand people in nonsurvivable places. Fuel will be expensive and hoarded. He noted that the most efficient of all vehicles is an old pickup fully loaded with people, driving slowly. He suggested that freight trains be required to provide a few empty boxcars for hoboes. Donkeys, he advised, provide reliable transport, and they dine as comfortably on the Wall Street Journal as they did on Pravda. Security has to take into account that prisons will be emptied (by stages, preferably), overseas troops will be repatriated and released, and cops will go corrupt. You will have a surplus ofmentally unstable people skilled with weapons. There will be crime waves and mafias, but you can rent a policeman, hire a soldier. Security becomes a matter of local collaboration. When the formal legal structure breaks down, adaptive improvisation can be pretty efficient. By way of readiness, Orlov urges all to prepare for life without a job, with near-zero burn rate. It takes practice to learn how to be poor well. Those who are already poor have an advantage. [ms; Finally, OUR TIME HAS COME! We the penniless are the New A-Listers! ;-)] –Stewart Brand
The text of Dmitry Orlov’s SALT talk. Slides from 2006 talk, “Closing the Collapse Gap.”
Related articles by Zemanta
The Dystopians - featuring Dmitry Orlov (longnow.org)
-
Posted to michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us
The Tyranny of Dead Ideas
http://michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us/packets/?p=909
Journalist and former Clinton administration adviser Matt Miller discusses his new book “The Tyranny of Dead Ideas: Letting Go of the Old Ways of Thinking to Unleash a New Prosperity.” Miller is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress and a contributing editor at Fortune magazine. He’s also an award-winning contributor to The New York Times and a commentator on National Public Radio. Miller spoke at the Commonwealth Club of California earlier this week. SOURCE: Minnesota Public Radio Dead Ideas:
Things will always be better; our kids will always do better economically than we have. Free Trade is good, no matter how many people it hurts. Your company should take care of you. (Why are companies saddled providing healthcare, for instance?) Taxes hurt the economy and are always too high. Schools are a local matter. Money follows merit. We live in a just meritocracy.
What we can do about them:
Only Government can save Business. Only Business can save Liberalism (because Free Market pays for social justice programs). Only Higher Taxes can save the economy and the planet. Only Lower Upper Class can save us from Inequality. Only Better Living can save us from sagging paychecks. Only a dose of Nationalization can save local schools. Only lessons from Abroad can save American Ideals.
Will be rebroadcast on Feb 27 on KQED.
-
Posted to michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us
Social Collapse Best Practices; Creative Social Collapse Event on FRIDAY Feb. 13
http://michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us/packets/?p=905
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:38:35 -0800From: Stewart BrandSubject: [SALT] Creative social collapse FRIDAY Feb. 13 [Note 2 ways to assure yourself a seat, below] A close observer of the collapse of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe twenty years ago, engineer Dmitry Orlov finds a similar sequence of events taking shape in America. His savagely humorous presentation spells out how Russia was better prepared than the US is now for the stages of collapse — which begin with financial meltdown. Renewal awaits on the other side of collapse, and there are ways to hasten that process. Orlov is the author of Reinventing Collapse: Soviet Example and American Prospects. “Social Collapse Best Practices” Dmitry OrlovCowell Theater, Fort Mason, San Francisco7pm, FRIDAY, February 13 The show starts promptly at 7:30pm. Admission is free — if there’s room. To be sure of a seat, become a Long Now member and reserve a seat or order an advance ticket ($10). Recent SALT talks have overflowed, and latecomers had to be turned away. To head off the problem, here’s the new arrangement: You can also purchase tickets for $10 HERE Please note, Members and Ticket holders: if you arrive after 7:25pm we may not be able to seat you in the theater. All tickets and RSVP’s are Will-Call; advance sales and RSVP’s end at 3:00pm on Feb. 13. Please allow time for traffic, parking, walking to the theater, and check-in. The Seminar will be simulcast in the lobby with free overflow seating, and any extra seats in the theater will be released right before the lecture starts.
-
Posted to michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us
What if 25% and Growing Real U.S. Unemployment is Equilibrium?
http://michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us/packets/?p=901
From Capitalism++ For starters, it would be called Structural Unemployment; and there is mounting, compelling evidence that this is precisely where we’re headed. Not as punishment — unless we are stupid and inflexible about it — but as the logical outcome of the overwhelming success of industrialization. Nevertheless, it’s also observed in nature that every metamorphosis is an excruciating process; an epiphany of existential crisis.
-
Posted to michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us
Singularity University: FutureSkew U ?
http://michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us/packets/?p=895
Let’s see if I read this right: Pay $25,000 for the privilege of pitching the VC’s so you can give away 80% of your total Return on Innovation to the same 8% of the population who already owns 80% of the wealth? Please do blast my biases to smithereens, but this doesn’t exactly strike me as a Roadmap to Postscarcity.
-
Posted to michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us
A-List Attitude Check
http://michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us/packets/?p=855
Ever run into an alleged A-lister at a conference or public gathering somewhere and been snubbed or shrugged off like a nobody? Just remember, that’s more of a negative reflection upon them, than upon you; and they haven’t done JACK compared to the true class act legends of the industry. Scroll to 5:25 mins in the video below to find out how the true “A for Authentic” A-listers behave versus those “A for Ass” listers. Choose your future persona in advance.
-
Posted to michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us
Begging my pardon sir, Are You A Capitalist?
http://michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us/packets/?p=791
At 1:10, “Or is the wealth of America concentrated in the hands of a few, as the [American scholars], Socialist, and Communists say? This is our central question.”
At 4:25 seconds, “makes Karl Marx, the world’s worst prophet. Marx prophesied that under capitalism, wealth would be concentrated in the hands of fewer and fewer; while the great majority of people would suffer increasing poverty. Perhaps even the disciples of socialism and communism, will come out of their Shadowy Pipe Dreams and join us in our March of Human Progess.” Oops. Let’s ask Alan Greenspan: “Yes, income inequality is increasing, the data are just very clear” (@ 2:15) “If you have increasing sense that the rewards of capitalism are being distributed unjustly, the system will not stand” (@ 2:54).
So, how is YOUR “March of Human Progess” going today? Oh, that’s right, you don’t even have a computer or internet connection to be reading this. My bad. It doesn’t matter though, if you’re not online, you clearly don’t matter. Go find a shovel and quit whining, you worthless leech on society.
-
Posted to michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us
Just for the Record
http://michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us/packets/?p=786
States’ Funds for Jobless Are Drying Up - NYTimes.com We told you so: Progressives were right about the financial crisis but were ignored. Will they be listened to now? - Salon.com
Both of these articles thanks to @wa8dzp!
-
Posted to michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us
Dr. Ben, Sir Ken, and Capitalism++
http://michael.silverton.palo-alto.ca.us/packets/?p=749
Today, I am very happy to discover more leading intellectual energy applied to these urgently pragmatic and timely matters. By way of preface, I’d like to first share a few preliminary observations from a morning radio program that I hope will further help to humanize the technical and operational requirements inherent to architectures for Capitalism++. The purpose will become more clear when we later introduce the relevance of “economic mechanisms in their social context.” This morning on KQED Forum, 10-year veteran network engineers were told that they were right to consider “mowing lawns” or “retooling” for new “relevant” skills. When did IT expertise become irrelevant to Web 5.0 or whatever the marketers call it next? Added insult was piled on to injury by virtue of the hasty ambivalence conveyed through both content and tenor of the remarks when one bold listener called in with sufficient bravery to share his success at becoming healthy thanks to treatment for some version of bipolar disorder. This is a spectrum of affliction that plagues many of the best and brightest in the field, but which is still shunned and hushed with plague-like ignorance and fear. The caller could in all likelihood be healthier than the modal norm for his cohort, due in no small part to the all too rare enlightened self-knowledge that often leads to successful treatment and oft-consequent “better than baseline” emotional health outcomes. Instead, the caller will most likely continue to fall victim to increasing career ostracization in recompense for such conscientious and objectivity lucid behavior. Getting emotionally healthy is arguably the only prudent healthcare decision that is, in effect, still the functional equivalent of a sociological — and certainly professional — crime. Hence, try as I may, I simply can not believe that these highly respectable public voices can mete out such outmoded advice with a straight face. While the foregoing biases against the obvious benefits of improved emotional health may be arguably absurd on a number of post information-age levels; added to this morning’s program was the persistent denial of the obvious rampant ageism which is increasingly undeniable in a rapidly consolidating labor market. Much of the double speak surrounding this matter borders on the intellectually abject. These are tech jobs for which highly motivated 50 year-olds are ideally and superiorly qualified in every way, with many even willing to accept sometimes grotesquely depressed wages. But the message from authoritative voices for the status quo of lifelong wage slavery is, “you’ve accrued too much market value by virtue of your strong moral character, diligence, and hard earned cross-disciplinary experience; so go do something for which you lack such accrued value.” This Blame the Victim “retooling” message is part and parcel of the timeless and implicit wage slavery mantra encoded into such utterly bankrupt cliches as “overqualified.” Such tired, cheap, amateur Jedi mind tricks may have worked on illiterate railroad workers and dam builders, but they just ain’t gonna’ cut it for today’s displaced and fully self-aware engineers, MBA’s, doctors, and lawyers. Nope, you’re just not going to weasel and waffle out of this one, Mssrs. Forbes & Kudlow. Against the backdrop of many other such socioeconomic realities, and with typical intellectual incisiveness, Dr. Ben Goertzel cuts to the heart of the systems side of such matters as they pertain to retooling our economic system, captured briefly in the following excerpts. Please read the full post for his complete and accurate context. [T]he recent crisis could be viewed as a failure of the rational-actor model — and a validation of the need to view socioeconomic systems as complex self-organizing systems, involving psychological, sociological and economic dynamics all tangled together … a need that will only increase as technology advances and makes it harder and harder for even smart rational-minded people to approximate rational economic judgments. As a semi-aside: In terms of traditional economists, I’d say Galbraith’s perspective probably accounts for this crisis best. He was always skeptical of over-mathematical approaches, and stressed the need to look at economic mechanisms in their social context. [T]he novel problem that we have here (added on top of the usual human problems of dishonesty, corruption, and so forth) may be that, in a world that is increasingly complex (with financial instruments defined by advanced mathematics, for example), being a rational economic actor is too difficult for almost anybody. The rational-actor assumption fails for a lot of reasons, as many economists have documented in the last few decades … but this analysis of the current financial crisis suggests that as technology advances, it is going to fail worse and worse. The economy is, in some senses, becoming fantastically more and more efficient (at producing more and more interesting configurations of matter and mind given less and less usage of human and material resources) … but it’s doing so via complex, self-organizing dynamics … not via libertarian-style, rational-actor-based free-market dynamics.
File under, “more WHY’S of Capitalism++” and why Basic Income.
1